Hello, friends! I am currently in the process of finding a team to develop an MVP for a startup, and I am faced with the question: is it worth working with DigisCorp? They offer MVP development services, but I want to know what people who have already worked with them think. Does anyone have experience? How do they perform in terms of deadlines and quality? How flexible are they in the process? My team and I understand that at the initial stage it is important to test the idea as quickly and cost-effectively as possible, but at the same time we want the final product to be functional and adequately reflect the concept. I would be grateful for your feedback!
top of page
bottom of page
Hi, I'm interested to know more info about this too, or my friend just need to solve a problem with MVP development services
I have just recently completed working with bespoke mvp development services, so I will try to share as much detail as possible about my experience. Overall, my impressions of the company are positive, but as always, there are some things to consider, especially if you are at the startup stage. Let me start by saying that the most important criteria for us were speed and the ability to quickly test a hypothesis with minimal costs. DigisCorp was a perfect fit for these needs. In fact, for startups that want to enter the market as quickly as possible, an MVP is not just an app, but rather a tool for testing a business idea. We actively worked out the concept with them, and their team offered several options on how to implement the minimum functionality as efficiently as possible. They really understand what is needed for the initial version of the product, and they do not try to cram everything in there. The deadlines are, of course, an interesting point. At the beginning of the work, they promised us specific deadlines, but in fact there were small delays. To be honest, I didn’t pay much attention to this, as I understand that at the mvp development services stage there are always things that require improvements as the work progresses. For example, after the first tests with focus groups, we found that a couple of key features needed to be added or changed, and this required additional time. In principle, they warned us right away that such things might appear at the testing stage, and they are honest in this regard. Of course, it is always important for a startup to meet deadlines, but if this ultimately leads to improved quality, I think it is justified. The flexibility of the team is another plus. During our work, we changed our focus several times, tried different approaches to functionality and design, and the team always responded with understanding. I know that some studios start to “rest on” their initial concept, but this was not the case here. They offered several solutions that we could adapt to our needs. This is very important because startups are rarely 100% sure of their initial vision for a product, and the ability to change it as we go is what we needed.
I agree with your opinion! My colleagues and I also worked with DigisCorp on an MVP for one of our projects. In principle, the experience was positive, but it is important to understand that an MVP is always an experiment, and here you need to be prepared for the fact that not everything will go according to plan. We encountered small delays during the testing phase, but as you correctly noted, this is normal when the product is still at the hypothesis testing stage.